Category: News

Purpose of review: Sudden cardiac arrest and sudden cardiac death are less common in children and adolescents than in the adult population. The outcomes from sudden cardiac arrest are generally quite poor in all ages and some data suggest that they are worse in the child and adolescent age group. In addition, the incidence of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) use is generally quite low although it is somewhat variable across communities. This review has been written in order to review the data for pediatric bystander CPR and AED use as it relates to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival. The purpose of this article is also to review endeavors at CPR–AED education in the context of improving both community bystander CPR/AED interventions and OHCA survival. Finally, this review will attempt to suggest some potential educational interventions in order to increase both bystander CPR-AED use and OHCA survival in local communities.

Recent findings: Findings from several recent studies suggest that the incidence of bystander CPR–AED intervention is relatively low and that OHCA survival is also quite low in most communities. Several studies also suggest that community educational efforts can increase bystander CPR–AED interventions. The increase in OHCA survival may be attributed to the community educational efforts, yet that increase in survival is relatively small. A prospective high-school study has shown that in this very specific environment, a high incidence of CPR–AED use can be achieved, and that as a result the OHCA survival can be relatively high.

Summary: It would be beneficial to attempt to ensure that all schools have a CPR–AED program along with a group of individuals trained to do CPR and use an AED. Not only should all schools have a cardiac emergency response plan (CERP) but all schools should have CPR–AED programs and all students should learn CPR and AED use prior to graduation. This strategy will ensure that we will have a community of individuals who would perform CPR and use an AED in the community and that in so doing we could increase the incidence of bystander CPR/AED use and increase the OHCA survival rate.

Link to full article;

CPR and AEDs save lives: insuring CPR–AED education and CPR–AED access in schools – PubMed

Background: ECG-monitoring is a strong predictor for 30-days survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). The aim of the study is to investigate factors influencing the effect of ECG-monitoring on 30-days survival after IHCA and elements of importance in everyday clinical practice regarding whether patients are ECG-monitored prior to IHCA.

Methods: In all, 19.225 adult IHCAs registered in the Swedish Registry for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (SRCR) were included. Cox-adjusted survival curves were computed to study survival post IHCA. Logistic regression was used to study the association between 15 predictors and 30-days survival. Using logistic regression we calculated propensity scores (PS) for ECG-monitoring; the PS was used as a covariate in a logistical regression estimating the association between ECG-monitoring and 30-days survival. Gradient boosting was used to study the relative importance of all predictors on ECG-monitoring.

Results: Overall 30-days survival was 30%. The ECG-monitored group (n = 10.133, 52%) had a 38% lower adjusted mortality (HR 0.62 95% CI 0.60-0.64). We observed tangible variations in ECG-monitoring ratio at different centres. The predictors of most relative influence on ECG-monitoring in IHCA were location in hospital and geographical localization.

Conclusion: ECG-monitoring in IHCA was associated to a 38% lower adjusted mortality, despite this finding only every other IHCA patient was monitored. The significant variability in the frequency of ECG-monitoring in IHCA at different centres needs to be evaluated in future research. Guidelines for in-hospital ECG-monitoring could contribute to an improved identification and treatment of patients at risk, and possibly to an improved survival.

Full article below;

ECG-monitoring of in-hospital cardiac arrest and factors associated with survival – PubMed (nih.gov)

Aims: To describe and explore predictors of bystander defibrillation in Ireland during the period 2012 to 2020. To examine the relationship between bystander defibrillation and health system developments.

Methods: National level Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) registry data were interrogated, focusing on patients who had defibrillation performed. Bystander defibrillation (as compared to EMS initiated defibrillation) was the key outcome of concern. Logistic regression models were built and refined by fitting predictors, performing stepwise variable selection and by adding pairwise interactions that improved fit.

Results: The data included 5,751 cases of OHCA where defibrillation was performed. Increasing year over time (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.13, 1.21) was associated with increased adjusted odds of bystander defibrillation. Non-cardiac aetiology was associated with reduced adjusted odds of bystander defibrillation (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.21, 0.42), as were increasing age in years (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.987, 0.996) and night-time occurrence of OHCA (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.53, 0.83). Six further variables in the final model (sex, call response interval, incident location (home or other), who witnessed collapse (bystander or not witnessed), urban or rural location, and the COVID period) were involved in significant interactions. Bystander defibrillation was in general less likely in urban settings and at home locations. Whilst women were less likely to receive bystander defibrillation overall, in witnessed OHCAs, occurring outside the home, in urban areas and outside of the COVID-19 period women were more likely, to receive bystander defibrillation.

Conclusions: Defibrillation by bystanders has increased incrementally over time in Ireland. Interventions to address sex and age-based disparities, alongside interventions to increase bystander defibrillation at night, in urban settings and at home locations are required.

Link to article below;

Bystander defibrillation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Ireland – ScienceDirect

The increased use of the automated external defibrillator (AED) contributes to the rising survival rate after sudden cardiac arrest in the Netherlands. When used, the AED records the unconscious person’s medical data (heart rhythm and information about cardiopulmonary resuscitation), which may be important for further diagnosis and treatment. In practice, ethical and legal questions arise about what can and should be done with these ‘AED data’. In this article, the authors advocate the development of national guidelines on the handling of AED data. These guidelines should serve two purposes: (1) to safeguard that data are handled carefully in accordance with data protection principles and the rules of medical confidentiality; and (2) to ensure nationwide availability of data for care of patients who survive resuscitation, as well as for quality monitoring of this care and for related scientific research. Given the medical ethical duties of beneficence and fairness, existing (sometimes lifesaving) information about AED use ought to be made available to clinicians and researchers on a structural basis. Creating a national AED data infrastructure, however, requires overcoming practical and organisational barriers. In addition, further legal study is warranted.

Full article below;

Resuscitation with an AED: putting the data to use – PubMed (nih.gov)

Resuscitation with an AED: putting the data to use | Netherlands Heart Journal (springer.com)

Public Access Defibrillators: Urgent Need to Keep them Alive – PubMed (nih.gov)

Public access defibrillators: Urgent need to keep them alive – Resuscitation (resuscitationjournal.com)

Abstract: The role of early defibrillation has been well established as a pivotal ring of the chain of survival since the nineties. In the following years, the scientific evidences about the beneficial role of early defibrillation have grown, and most of all, it has been demonstrated that the main determinant of survival is the time of defibrillation more than the type of rescuer. Early lay defibrillation was shown to be more effective than delayed defibrillation by healthcare providers. Moreover, because of the ease of use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs), it has been shown that also untrained lay rescuers can safely use an AED leading the guidelines to encourage early defibrillation by untrained lay bystanders. Although strong evidence has demonstrated that an increase in AED use leads to an increase in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival, the rate of defibrillation by laypeople is quite variable worldwide and very low in some realities. The review of this literature about lay defibrillation highlights that the AED is a life-saving device as simple and well tolerated as underused.

Full reference below;

Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine (lww.com)

The automated external defibrillator, an underused simple life-saving device: a review of the literature. A joint document from the Italian Resuscitation Council (IRC) and Associazione Italiana di Aritmologia e Cardiostimolazione (AIAC) – PubMed (nih.gov)

Introduction: Cardiac arrest results in a high death rate if cardiopulmonary resuscitation and early defibrillation are not performed. Mortality is strongly linked to regulations, in terms of prevention and emergency-urgency system organization. In Italy, training of lay rescuers and the presence of defibrillators were recently made mandatory in schools. This study aimed to analyse Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) events in pediatric patients (under 18 years old), to understand the epidemiology of this phenomenon and provide helpful evidence for policy-making.

Methods: A retrospective observational analysis was conducted on the emergency databases of Lombardy Region, considering all pediatric OHCAs managed between 1 January 2016, and 31 December 2019. The demographics of the patients and the logistics of the events were statistically analyzed.

Results: The incidence in paediatric subjects was 4.5 (95% CI 3.6-5.6) per 100,000 of the population. School buildings and sports facilities had relatively few events (1.9% and 4.4%, respectively), while 39.4% of OHCAs were preventable, being due to violent accidents or trauma, mainly occurring on the streets (23.2%).

Conclusions: Limiting violent events is necessary to reduce OHCA mortality in children. Raising awareness and giving practical training to citizens is a priority in general but specifically in schools.

Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the Paediatric Patient: An Observational Study in the Context of National Regulations – PubMed (nih.gov)

Full article below;

Extracting physiologic and clinical data from defibrillators for research purposes to improve treatment for patients in cardiac arrest – ScienceDirect

An interesting Article in the Resuscitation Journal

Abstract

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a global public health issue experienced by approximately 3.8 million people annually. Only 8% to 12% survive to hospital discharge. Early defibrillation of shockable rhythms is associated with improved survival, but ensuring timely access to defibrillators has been a significant challenge. To date, the development of public-access defibrillation programs, involving the deployment of automated external defibrillators into
the public space, has been the main strategy to address this challenge. Public-access defibrillator programs have been associated with improved outcomes for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; however, the devices are used in <3% of episodes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. This scientific statement was commissioned by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation with 3 objectives:

1. Identify known barriers to public-access defibrillator use and early defibrillation

2. Discuss established and novel strategies to address those barriers, and

3.  Identify high-priority knowledge gaps for future research to address.

The writing group undertook systematic searches of the literature to inform this statement. Innovative strategies were identified that relate to enhanced public outreach, behaviour change approaches, optimisation of static public-access defibrillator deployment and housing, evolved automated external defibrillator technology and functionality, improved integration of public-access defibrillation with existing emergency dispatch protocols, and exploration of novel automated external defibrillator delivery vectors.

The study provides evidence- and consensus based policy suggestions to enhance public-access defibrillation and guidance for future research in this area.

Full article information below;

Optimizing Outcomes After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest With Innovative Approaches to Public-Access Defibrillation: A Scientific Statement From the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation – PubMed (nih.gov)

Modeling optimal AED placement to improve cardiac arrest survival: The challenge is implementation – Resuscitation (resuscitationjournal.com)